I am writing to bring your attention to a matter of grave concern involving the Department of Children and Families (DCF) and the recent dismissal of injunctions designed to protect two young boys from an abusive individual.
As a concerned parent, that had proof that certain critical pieces of evidence pertaining to an abuser and his abuse towards minors (four documented times) were either overlooked or inadequately addressed by the DCF. These omissions have directly compromised the reliability of DCF and their ability to adequately protect children.
In order to emphasize the gravity of the situation, I would like to provide details regarding the incidents of abuse and drinking involving this person that were overlooked by the courts and DCF:
– Verified Reports of Abuse: Reports were filed with DCF, documenting physical violence resulting in extensive bruises on the legs and buttocks of two males. Note in the reports that only three incidents of bruising were reported, yet these incidents were recorded as regular occurrences despite prior warnings. Additionally, there were verified reports of sexual abuse towards a minor daughter that the worker admitted could have happened while intoxicated, further indicating a significant risk to the well-being of the minor children.
– History of Violence: Previous arrest record for domestic violence in 2007 and aggravated battery in 2011, and in 2013 was found guilty of Battery on a Pregnant Woman. This pattern of violence reinforces concerns for the safety of the two males.
– Previous Injunction: An injunction was previously imposed on reports of abuse towards the minor children. This information underscores the need for caution and appropriate measures to protect the well-being of the children.
1. New Evidence: The abuser was involved in an accident in Colorado on 01/21/2022, which occurred after the incidents of abuse. He was charged with driving under the influence and pleaded guilty on 08/15/2023. Additionally, he has a history of DUI convictions in Polk County (03/21/2008) and Hillsborough County (11/30/2013). These instances raise serious concerns about the potential risks the abuser poses to the safety of the minor children. It also shows a continuation of dangerous and reckless behavior, especially since alcohol was documented as being a crucial part of the verified sexual abuse.
2. Inadequate Protection for the two young males: The court’s decision to dissolve the injunctions was based on DCF not disputing the dissolution which fails to provide sufficient protection for the two young males. Considering the verified reports of abuse, history of violence, ongoing alcohol use, and other documented incidents.
It is essential that the Lakeland Gazette, as a trusted news source, helps shed light on this matter and gives it the attention it deserves. By raising awareness, we can advocate for the rights and safety of not only the two young males, but other vulnerable children who may face similar circumstances.
I kindly request that you consider investigating and reporting on this case, ensuring that the negligence of the court and DCF is properly addressed. This is a critical issue that warrants the attention of the public, individuals, and organizations who can help rectify the situation and prevent further harm.
Thank you for your time and consideration. I remain available to provide any supplementary information or answer any questions you may have regarding this urgent matter.
Note, in the report, when the lady at the school reported me as possibly being on drugs, I was in shock and upset that DCF allowed my son go back with his mother since I only objected my son from going to the school that was across the street where he lived along with the abuser who was still on the pickup list that I could not take him off of due to the mother not adding me as the father yet I still brought him to school even though I didn’t like it. I was very upset and broke down crying and couldn’t articulate my words very well. I have since won custody of my son due to the failure of the mother to protect my son and her intending to go back around the abusive person. DCF allowing the injunction to be dismissed will allow the children to go back around the abuser.
Editorial note: The Lakeland Gazette removed the Abuser and the Children’s names from this Letter to the Editor,