Lakeland Residents Deserve AI Transparency from City Hall

A person uses a chatbot for assistance on a website. Nearly 65% of state and local governments are in the planning stages of AI adoption for resident-facing services, according to a PayIt survey. Getty Images

Lakeland residents should demand clear rules if the city, utilities, or police use AI in services like permitting or billing.

Nearly 90% of Americans want local governments to always disclose AI use in digital services. Comfort rises sharply when specific uses are explained, hitting 65% for answering service questions and 60% for paying bills.

What notifications, privacy safeguards and appeal channels should Lakeland provide?

Proliferating AI tools have the potential to transform local government digital services, experts say, whether by streamlining permitting processes or helping residents navigate municipal websites. 

More than 90% of local government leaders using AI say it has boosted operational efficiency, according to PayIt.

But another survey this year found public trust around government use of the technology is lagging.

The July PayIt survey of 815 adults who had completed a state or local government transaction online in the past 18 months shows they didn’t perceive all AI use cases the same way. 

“When we named specific uses instead of asking about AI in the abstract, comfort rose on nearly every one,” PayIt stated. “Residents are more willing than the broad question suggests, once they know what the AI would actually be doing.”

Nearly 65% of respondents said they were comfortable with state and local governments using AI to answer questions about government services, and nearly 60% were also comfortable with AI assistance to pay a bill or apply for a license.

See also  Why Activists Want Stacy Campbell-Domineck Off LHA Board

Respondents were more divided about using AI to resolve customer complaints or service problems, with 54% saying they were comfortable and 46% reporting discomfort. Fifty-one percent said they were uncomfortable with using AI to evaluate eligibility for a government benefit, and 49% said they were comfortable. 

Residents’ willingness to allow an AI agent to to handle interactions with state and local government services on their behalf was murky, with 37% responding no, 32% saying yes and 31% unsure. 

A quarter of respondents who interacted with AI for government services ranked the experience as “fair,” 39% ranked it as “good,” and 23% ranked it as “excellent.”

(Visited 83 times, 1 visits today)